Dear Joely: Two Women Turn Every Friday Lunch into an Accounting Tribunal
A pleasant Friday lunch repeatedly descends into forensic accounting when two colleagues insist on paying separately. Cathy wants to know whether she is being unreasonable, or whether the bill-splitting palaver really is enough to spoil dessert.
The meal is pleasant. The company is good. Then the bill arrives and eight grown women begin reconstructing lunch from witness statements.
Dear Joely,
I’m sure this is a problem as old as time, but I am living it and it sh*%s me every time it happens. Perhaps you can help.
A group of six to eight women from my office goes out to a fairly basic restaurant for lunch on Fridays. It’s a good way for us to catch up without the interruptions of work. The boss knows and allows us a little more than the allocated hour, which is nice.
At the end, we get the bill. Most of us are perfectly happy to split it, except for two members of the group who insist on paying separately.
It always turns into a palaver while all the adding and subtracting goes on. Then, without fail, there is another mini-deliberation about the tip.
Usually, I’ve had a nice meal and enjoyed the conversation, but when this happens I can’t help throwing the stink-eye at the culprits. Last time, I think I even sighed out loud.
I should add that none of us drinks alcohol at these lunches, so it’s not as though these two Karens are being asked to subsidise somebody else’s bottle of wine.
Am I being unreasonable, or are they?
Yours billigerently,
Cathy
Dear Billigerent Cathy,
The problem is not that two women want to pay only for what they ordered. That is perfectly reasonable.
The problem is that eight hungry adults are attempting to perform forensic accounting beside a cooling plate of chips.
Splitting the bill works beautifully when everyone has spent roughly the same amount and nobody minds subsidising somebody else’s extra side of halloumi. Paying separately also works beautifully when the restaurant is told at the beginning, rather than when the bill arrives and Sandra suddenly begins reconstructing lunch from witness statements.
So next Friday, say this before anybody orders:
“Can we decide now whether we’re splitting the bill or paying individually? If anyone wants to pay separately, perhaps we can let the waiter know before we start.”
That is not rude. It is administration, and administration is best conducted before dessert.
As for the tip, agree on a percentage and divide it in the same manner as the meal. There should be no second summit meeting unless the waiter has performed CPR.
And retire the word “Karens”. They may be parsimonious, exacting or simply watching their money. You are allowed to dislike the palaver without turning two colleagues into a meme.
The stink-eye may remain, but deploy it sparingly. Like truffle oil, too much ruins lunch.
Yours, with the calculator already open,
Joely
Dear Joely: My Sock Drawer Has Become a Personality
A 32-year-old man has a job, a flat, a girlfriend and far too many socks. Is his novelty hosiery harmless joy, or a crisis unfolding from the ankles down?
Dear Joely,
I am a 32-year-old man who, on paper at least, seems to have his life reasonably sorted. I have a decent job in IT, my own flat in a middling part of town, and I can cook a passable spaghetti bolognese without setting off the smoke alarm every time. Yet here I am, writing to you with a problem that feels both ridiculous and strangely genuine.
The issue is my socks. Yes, really. For the past year or so, I have developed what can only be described as a mild obsession with buying new pairs of socks. Colourful ones, thick hiking ones, those fancy bamboo ones that promise to eliminate odour (they do not), and even a pair with little pineapples on them that make me smile every time I put them on. My sock drawer now resembles a jumble sale, and every time I open it, I feel a strange mix of pride and panic.
The trouble is that my girlfriend of six months has started to notice. She is practical, organised, and the sort of person who folds her T-shirts with military precision. Last week she suggested we “have a clear-out”, and I found myself defending my pineapple socks as if they were treasured family heirlooms. I mumbled something about self-expression and personal joy, but I fear I sounded unhinged.
Deep down, I know this is probably a symptom of something else, maybe a fear of proper grown-up commitment, or the creeping realisation that I am hurtling towards middle age with nothing more substantial to show for it than an impressive collection of foot coverings.
I do love her, and I want to be the sort of man who has his life together rather than one who argues passionately in defence of novelty hosiery. But every time I try to throw a pair away, I hesitate. What if those are the socks that finally bring me luck, or at least a decent day?
Please tell me if I am being absurd, or whether this is a perfectly normal male rite of passage that no one talks about. Any advice on how to balance sock-related happiness with not driving my girlfriend up the wall would be gratefully received.
Yours in mild embarrassment,
Sock Hoarder from Surrey
Dear Sock Hoarder,
You are not having a commitment crisis. You are having a storage crisis wearing tiny pineapples.
The socks themselves are not the problem. Colourful socks are harmless, cheerful and considerably preferable to many of the hobbies available to a 32-year-old man with disposable income and internet access. You could be collecting vintage swords, cryptocurrency or opinions about craft beer. Novelty hosiery is practically civic-minded.
What matters is whether buying them has become compulsive, expensive, secretive or emotionally loaded. If you are spending money you cannot afford, hiding purchases, or using new socks to anaesthetise yourself every time life feels dull, then yes, there may be something worth examining beneath the bamboo blend.
But from what you describe, this sounds less like a psychological emergency and more like a small source of pleasure that has outgrown its allotted drawer.
Your girlfriend is also not unreasonable. She sees chaos. You see possibility. Both of you are being honest, although only one of you appears to believe a pineapple can improve morale from the ankle down.
So do not stage a brutal purge. Create a system.
Keep the pairs you genuinely wear and love. Throw away any that are stretched, uncomfortable, holey, mysteriously single or capable of standing upright unaided. Put the rest into one defined space. When that space is full, one pair must leave before another pair enters. This is not oppression. It is border control.
And do not surrender the pineapple socks. Every relationship needs one object that makes no sense to the other person but is nevertheless protected by treaty.
As for your fear that the socks represent all you have to show for adulthood, I would point out that you have a job, a flat, a relationship and a bolognese that only occasionally threatens the fire brigade. That is a perfectly respectable life. Adulthood is not proved by owning fewer socks. It is proved by knowing which ones are worth keeping.
With full support for regulated pineapple retention,
Joely
Dear Joely: My Friend Ditched Me for a Pub Fixture
A rare night out ends badly when one friend vanishes into the beer garden with a stranger, leaving the other waiting, worrying and quietly furious.
Dear Joely,
I'm a 55-year-old woman living in Melbourne. I have a good female friend, a bit older than me, whom I have known for many years. We don't catch up often enough, but when we do, we always vow not to leave it so long before getting together again.
When we do get together, we normally start with dinner and a catch-up. The wine begins to flow, and then we go to a few bars for drinks afterwards. Because it's such a rare thing, it's not unusual to get a bit tipsy and find ourselves doing something silly like karaoke or dancing with very young men. The next day, we text to compare hangovers. It might seem a bit childish, but for us, it seems to be a good way to dust off the cobwebs.
On the last occasion, we ended up in this rather awful bar. Many of the men there looked as though the place was their second home. They seemed to come up to us one after the other and try their luck. I found it rather dull and would have preferred to carry on talking together, but my friend started getting all giggly and girly with one of these men. I was trying my best not to be bitchy towards the man involved. Smile politely, etc.
My friend at one point excused herself to go to the ladies. After she left, the man tried harder to get a laugh out of me, but I was not impressed. At one point, he asked me if I'd rather he left me alone, and I actually nodded. So he left, and I waited for my friend.
And I waited. And I waited some more.
I began to worry that she might have been more tipsy than I suspected, so I decided to go and check the ladies' toilet. I didn't make it all the way back when I spied her in the beer garden. She and the boring guy who had been chatting with us previously were deeply engaged in a game of tonsil tennis. I was utterly floored and, to be honest, disgusted.
I went out, tapped her on the shoulder and said that I was going home. She made some protests, but I left before I could hear what she had to say.
I didn't hear from her again that night, but the next morning she texted a light-hearted message, hoping I got home safely, telling me she had a shocking headache and probably wouldn't be moving for the rest of the day. I just sent the normal smile emoji back in response.
I can't bring myself to reply. I still feel too angry. How dare she trade me in for some boozer? It's thinking of myself sitting there waiting for her, feeling concerned, while she wasn't giving me a care in the world that really sticks in my craw.
I haven't responded to her yet apart from that. I do love this friend, but I can't see myself going out with her again if that's the way she's going to carry on. Neither can I see us having a conversation about this that won't end badly.
I'm too old for this.
Yours
Pissed off, to be honest
Dear Pissed Off,
You are not too old for karaoke, questionable bars or dancing with men whose birthdays occurred alarmingly recently. You are, however, too old to be left sitting alone in a pub wondering whether your friend has fallen into a toilet cubicle while she is outside conducting an enthusiastic oral examination of a man who appears to have come with the furniture.
The problem is not that she kissed him. She is entitled to flirt, giggle and make decisions that look significantly less enchanting under the hard light of morning. The problem is that she vanished without telling you, left you waiting and worrying, and then sent a breezy hangover bulletin the next day as though the evening had concluded exactly as planned.
That was inconsiderate. You had gone out together. At the very least, she owed you a quick: “I'm heading outside with him. Are you all right getting home?” Friendship does not require a permission slip before tonsil tennis, but it does require basic courtesy.
I would not end a longstanding friendship over one drunken lapse, especially when you clearly love her. But I would not swallow your anger and pretend nothing happened either. Resentment kept under the tongue has a nasty aftertaste.
Say something simple:
“I was really upset that you disappeared without telling me. I was sitting there waiting and worrying about you, and then found you outside with him. I don't care that you kissed someone, but I do care that you left me without a word.”
That keeps the issue where it belongs. Not on the boring man. Not on her sexuality. Not on whether women in their fifties should know better than to behave badly in bars. On consideration.
Her response will tell you far more than the incident itself. If she is mortified and apologises, the friendship probably survives with one useful amendment to the constitution: no disappearing into beer gardens without notifying the other member of the delegation.
If she laughs it off or tells you that you are overreacting, then the problem is larger than one ill-advised snog with a pub fixture.
You are not too old for silly nights. You are simply old enough to expect better manners during them.
With sympathy for the hangover you didn't deserve,
Joely
New here?
Dear Joely is the resident advice column at Slightly Penetrating: candid letters about friendship, sex, relationships and modern social disasters, answered with warmth, dry humour and considerably less judgement than some situations deserve.
Meet Dear JoelyMore trouble from the postbag
The Case of the Wandering Toe Four neighbours. Two spas. Forty toes. Only one of them is causing trouble. I Said the Cruel Thing Out Loud at Dinner One dinner party, too much wine, and a truth that should never have arrived with witnesses. Browse every Dear Joely letterDear Joely: The Affair Was Perfect. Then He Went Down on Me.
She thought she had found tenderness, escape and the beginning of another life. Then one disastrous night in a hotel room gave her a serious case of the ick.
Dear Joely,
I am 44, married with two children, aged 12 and 8, but the relationship is all over bar the shouting. It won’t be easy to leave. My husband is abusive, not physically, but through a complex web of coercive control. I am seeing a psychologist. That’s just some background.
For a long while, I have felt as though I am ripe to have an affair. As I said, there is nothing between my husband and me, and I am constantly left alone while he works long hours and travels abroad for work. I work as well, but the childcare has somehow worked out to be my responsibility.
About four months ago, I met a man through work and we really hit it off straight away. He is intelligent, kind and generous, and we have heaps in common. We get together for meals whenever we can, normally lunches because of our commitments. We talk and talk and talk. He gets me, and for the first time in years I feel understood.
I should mention that he is also unhappily married. That’s just the start of it, though. Our lives are so similar it’s actually spooky.
Over time, we built up quite a closeness and, yes, an attraction as well. We ended up making a date to spend a night together at a hotel away from the area where we live. My children were spending the night with their grandparents.
It was really quite lovely being with him in those circumstances. I got to dress up, and we had drinks at a nice bar and then dinner together. It had been years since I had done anything even remotely like that.
After the drinks and food, we ended up back in the hotel room. Things progressed to kissing, then touching, and soon afterwards we were naked in bed.
He went down to give me oral sex, and that’s when things took a turn for the worse.
It was awful. It didn’t turn me on at all. He was all over the place and didn’t seem to have the first idea about female anatomy. I found myself in the really difficult position of not knowing whether to fake it or say something, which I think he detected.
I tried to encourage him to have normal sex, but that didn’t work either. He wasn’t erect. After all the weeks of build-up, talk, closeness and caring, followed by the drinks and dinner, it was a terrible outcome. I felt like crying.
He ended up pacing around the room, not naked, and I tried to get him to talk about it. He wouldn’t speak for ages. Eventually, he told me he had never gone down on a woman before and had felt enough about me to make me his first.
My reaction was not what he had hoped for, and he felt ashamed and embarrassed. I didn’t know what to say.
We spent an awkward night together, and the atmosphere was horrible. Since then, things haven’t been the same between us. I miss him terribly because the messages and conversations haven’t been as they were.
Worst of all, I cannot imagine in my wildest dreams ever having sex with him again. It has completely turned me off. I wish I could change that, but I have the ick. A serious case of it.
If I’m honest, I don’t know what’s worse: the fact that he had never given oral sex to a woman at his age, he is 39, or that his first attempt, with me, was so bad.
I feel down in the dumps, lonely, sad and disappointed. To be honest, I wish I had just given an Oscar-worthy performance.
Pathetic in Putney
Dear Pathetic in Putney,
First, you are not pathetic. You are disappointed, lonely, sexually underwhelmed and currently living inside a marriage where your freedom has been slowly parcelled up and handed back to you in supervised portions. That is quite enough misery without adding self-contempt to the buffet.
And no, you should not have given an Oscar-worthy performance.
An Oscar-worthy performance might have spared him one mortifying evening, but it would have sentenced you to an entire sequel. Possibly a franchise.
The problem is not simply that he was bad at oral sex. People can learn. Female anatomy is not guarded by riddles, fire-breathing dragons or a subscription paywall. A willing, attentive adult can improve enormously by listening, asking and resisting the urge to approach a vulva like an unfamiliar control panel.
What seems to have killed the mood was the whole peculiar bundle: his inexperience, your shock, his shame, the pacing, the silence, the failed erection, and the crushing distance between the night you had imagined and the one you actually got.
You had not merely booked a hotel room. You had booked passage out of your life.
For weeks, this man had been intelligence, kindness, conversation, recognition and possibility. He made you feel understood after years of being controlled and neglected. By the time you reached that bed, he was carrying the combined weight of romance, escape, sexual resurrection and proof that another life was waiting.
That is an impossible amount of luggage for one man to bring into a hotel room, particularly when he has never previously travelled south.
Your ick may be permanent. Sometimes desire disappears with the speed and finality of a stage trapdoor. But it may also be protecting you from the humiliation and sadness of that night. You cannot order yourself to want him again, but you also do not need to decide immediately that the entire connection was fraudulent.
The more revealing question is whether the two of you can talk honestly now.
Can he say, “I was inexperienced, frightened and ashamed,” without making you responsible for repairing his pride?
Can you say, “I was disappointed and overwhelmed, and I did not know how to guide you,” without turning his lack of experience into a character defect?
And can either of you discuss what happened without pretending the evening was solely a technical malfunction involving his tongue?
Because there is another awkward truth here: neither of you is free. You are both using this relationship partly as refuge from unhappy marriages. That does not mean your feelings are unreal. It does mean the relationship has been growing in a greenhouse, protected from school runs, bills, domestic habits, difficult decisions and the full weather of ordinary life.
Before deciding whether this man deserves another chance in bed, I would concentrate on something more urgent: creating a safe, independent plan for leaving your abusive marriage.
Coercive control often intensifies when the controlling person senses separation. Please continue working with your psychologist, and seek specialist domestic-abuse support to help you plan practically and safely. Do not make your escape dependent on whether this affair survives. You need a door that belongs to you, not one held open by another unhappily married person.
As for your lover, one honest conversation is warranted. Not because you owe him another sexual audition, but because you miss the friendship and closeness that existed before the hotel. Tell him the night affected you, that his withdrawal has hurt, and that you would rather speak plainly than let embarrassment rot the whole relationship in silence.
Then see what he does.
A man can be forgiven for not knowing where everything is. At thirty-nine, however, he should be capable of having a conversation after getting lost.
Yours in better exits and considerably better sex,
Joely
Dear Joely: The Case of the Wandering Toe
Four neighbours, drinks beneath the stars and one supposedly civilised spa arrangement. Everything is lovely — until an adventurous toe begins crossing boundaries below the waterline.
Dear Joely,
I am fortunate to live in one of the nicer areas of Sydney with my husband and our two young children. All is as well as can be in those departments.
We are very good friends with our neighbours across the street. They are a couple, about ten years older than us. Every month or so, the four of us get together for drinks and some food. We alternate between our houses as the venue.
We both have spas in our yards and, at the end of these evenings, we usually end up having a tub together, with more drinks and chats. We don’t wear clothes on these occasions. This isn’t for any racy reason. It just came about because none of us normally wears clothes when in our own spa, so we figured: why would we start on these social evenings?
Nothing is made of the nudity, and we all really enjoy chatting together in the warm tub under the stars.
All good so far, but the problem is this: the male neighbour has taken to touching me underwater with his toe.
I don’t mean an accidental touch. I mean he is putting his toe between my legs and looking for encouragement.
This is incredibly awkward for me. If I call it out when it’s happening, that’s the evening — and possibly future get-togethers — finished. Or he could deny it.
If I speak to the female neighbour about it alone — we are very close as friends — she might feel awkward or jealous, or not believe me.
I told my husband, and he seems more amused than anything.
I don’t want to encourage him in any way. I like things, apart from this problem, as they are.
I learned of your page from a different friend and thought — hoped — you might be able to help.
Yours
Unwanted Toe Attention
Dear Unwanted Toe Attention,
What a beautifully civilised arrangement you have created: good friends, warm water, drinks beneath the stars — and one man’s big toe attempting to start a separate social programme.
Let us clear up the only part that appears to be confusing anyone. Being naked in a spa is not an invitation to be touched. Your neighbour knows the difference between an accidental brush of the foot and deliberately placing his toe between your legs while watching to see what happens next.
This is not a rogue limb. He is conducting a small underwater feasibility study:
Will she react?
Will she say anything?
Might the toe be permitted to return?
The answer to the final question must be no.
You do not need to turn the evening into a neighbourhood emergency or suddenly announce, “Whose toe is that, and why is it there?”
Although it would settle the question rather efficiently.
The next time it happens, move away, look directly at him and say quietly:
“Please don’t do that again.”
No nervous laugh. No apology. No long explanation that allows him to pretend you have misunderstood the fascinating migratory habits of his foot.
If he denies it, simply say:
“Good. Then it won’t happen again.”
That is all you need.
I would not begin by speaking privately to his wife. He created the problem, and it should not be handed to the two women to manage between them over coffee. Speaking to her first also gives him the opportunity to deny it before you have ever addressed him directly.
Your husband’s amusement deserves a second conversation too. Tell him plainly that you are not flattered, entertained or secretly enjoying the attention. You feel uncomfortable and sexually intruded upon, and you need him to take that seriously. He does not have to storm across the street with a pool noodle unless that is what you want, but he does need to stop treating it as a saucy neighbourhood anecdote.
You are worried that objecting may spoil the evening or end future gatherings.
But darling, the evenings are already being spoiled. You are sitting in warm, bubbling water wondering whether a toe is about to make another covert border crossing while everyone discusses schools, renovations and interest rates above the surface.
That is no way to relax.
One calm, unmistakable boundary may be enough to return the foot to ordinary civilian life. Should it happen again, I would retire the shared spa evenings altogether. Not because nudity caused the problem, but because one guest has shown that he cannot be trusted with the arrangement.
Warm water, cold drinks and neighbourly nudity can coexist perfectly well.
They simply require all four adults — and all forty toes — to behave themselves.
Yours, with both feet firmly where they belong,
Joely
More dilemmas? Read more letters and replies in the Dear Joely advice column.
Dear Joely: The Towel Fell. His Assumptions Shouldn’t Have.
A tipsy towel dash in a share house leads to accidental nudity, unwanted attention, and one very necessary boundary.
Dear Joely,
I live in a rather large share house in Surrey. I'm 28 and it suits me at the moment. I only knew one of my housemates when I moved in. There are three others, two females and one male, that I had never met before. I get on well with each of them, but we tend to get on with our own lives and cross paths fairly randomly, mostly. I've been here for about three months at this point.
Without getting super complicated, most of our bedrooms, with the exception of the girl I knew when I moved in, are on the first floor.
A few weeks ago, I went through a hard time with a work situation. I'm not a big drinker, but on that particular occasion I decided to bring a few beers home and sit in my room and drown my sorrows. When I drink beer, it gives me a particularly strong signal when I need to have a wee. And this particular night was no exception.
It had gotten late and the house was quiet. I made the decision to creep down the hallway in just a short towel to use the toilet. I know this isn't acceptable in a share house, but I genuinely thought everyone was in bed. I was down in the dumps and a little bit tipsy.
Anyway, I ran into the one male who rents a room here. It sounds like a bad comedy, but I was so shocked when I ran into him that I dropped my towel. I was incredibly embarrassed, of course, but numbed a little bit by alcohol. I made some ridiculous remark and carried on to the bathroom.
You might think that might be the end of the story, but it isn't. He has taken this as an invitation to begin pursuing me, I think. He talks to me more than he used to. He hints at eating together and has sat down in the lounge room when I have been watching TV a couple of times. That's not a problem, but he tries to initiate conversation. Also, not a problem, but he would never have done this before the towel-dropping incident.
Last Friday, I was dressed up to go out and meet a girlfriend when he saw me on my way out. He asked where I was going and what time I thought I'd be home. The bottom line is things have gotten awkward. I'm really not interested in him. I wish I was. It would be too easy. But I'm not. So, what I have left is awkward, awkward, awkward.
I thought you might be able to help with some advice.
Yours
Regretting the Towel Dash
Dear Regretting the Towel Dash,
First of all: yes, walking down the hall in a towel in a share house is a risky little expedition. But let us not get hysterical. You did not stage a cabaret. You did not issue engraved invitations. You were tipsy, sad, caught short, and made a poor wardrobe decision between your bedroom and the toilet. These things happen. Sometimes the human body has needs and the laundry basket has the only available strategy.
The important point is this: accidentally dropping your towel is not consent, flirtation, foreplay, or a legally binding indication of romantic interest. It is a towel mishap. A mortifying one, yes, but still just a towel mishap.
Your male housemate appears to have taken one awkward glimpse of you and built himself a small conservatory of hope. That is unfortunate for him, but it is not your responsibility to furnish it.
You do not need to apologise for not fancying him. You do not need to reward his interest because it would be “easy.” Easy is not a reason to let someone into your life, your bed, your evening, or your nervous system. If you are not interested, that is the whole answer.
What you need now is a calm, boring, unmistakable boundary. Not dramatic. Not cruel. Not a house meeting with biscuits and laminated minutes. Just something direct enough that he cannot keep pretending the situation is charmingly ambiguous.
The next time he asks where you are going, when you will be home, or hints at dinner, say something like:
“Just so there’s no misunderstanding after the other night, I’m not interested in anything romantic or sexual between us. I’m happy for us to be friendly as housemates, but that’s all.”
Then stop talking. Do not pad it with “sorry” six times. Do not explain that you are busy, complicated, healing, not ready, emotionally unavailable, secretly joining a convent, or allergic to men who appear near bathrooms. Explanations invite negotiation. Clarity closes the door.
If he is decent, he will be embarrassed, back off, and life will become awkward for approximately seven to ten business days before everyone resumes pretending to be normal around the kettle.
If he does not back off — if he keeps asking where you are going, monitoring when you come home, sitting himself beside you despite your discomfort, or making the house feel unsafe — then this stops being a comedy of errors and becomes a housemate problem. In that case, speak to the housemate you already knew before moving in, and consider putting the boundary in writing. You are entitled to use the lounge, the hallway and the toilet without being quietly auditioned as someone’s girlfriend.
As for the towel dash: retire it. Not because you have done something shameful, but because communal living is already intimate enough without adding accidental nudity to the rota. Buy a robe. A proper one. Belted. Reliable. Less “French farce,” more “woman with bladder and boundaries.”
You are allowed to laugh about this eventually. But you are also allowed to feel uncomfortable now.
The towel fell. That was an accident.
His assumptions are not.
With sympathy, and a firm recommendation for pyjamas with elastic,
Joely
Dear Joely: Asking for a Friend, Obviously
A sceptical reader writes to test Joely’s advice-giving credentials, only to accidentally reveal rather more than they intended.
Dear Joely,
I have to admit I’m not sure I really believe in this sort of thing.
Advice columns always seem a bit made-up to me. People write in with these dramatic problems and then someone like you gives an answer that sounds wise and everyone claps. Maybe I’m being cynical, but it all feels a bit neat.
Anyway, I read a couple of your replies and thought I’d test you.
What exactly are you offering people here? Because from where I’m sitting, most advice is just common sense with nicer words. If someone is unhappy, leave. If someone treats you badly, tell them. If you’re lonely, join a club. If you hate your job, get another one. I don’t mean to be rude, but it doesn’t seem that complicated.
The problem is, people don’t do the obvious thing, do they?
I know someone who complains all the time about being lonely, but then when people invite them anywhere, they say no. They say they want connection, but they don’t answer messages properly. They say no one understands them, but they don’t explain themselves either.
At some point, surely you have to stop making everything deep and just admit some people are their own problem.
So what would you say to someone like that? Not me, obviously. Just someone I know.
Yours,
Not Entirely Convinced
Dear Not Entirely Convinced,
First of all, congratulations on writing an entire letter about “someone you know” while leaving your fingerprints all over the windows.
Very elegant. Very subtle. Nobody noticed. We were all too distracted by the enormous false moustache.
You ask what I am offering people here, and I’ll tell you: not rescue, not instructions, and certainly not a small laminated card marked How to Live Correctly. Most advice is not magic. You’re right about that. A great deal of it is common sense with better lighting.
Leave if you’re miserable. Speak if you’re hurt. Rest if you’re exhausted. Apologise if you’ve behaved badly. Stop texting the person who treats you like an optional side dish.
Simple, yes.
Easy? Almost never.
That is the bit you’ve conveniently stepped over while wearing your sensible shoes.
People often know what the obvious thing is. The problem is not usually information. The problem is fear, shame, habit, hope, pride, attachment, grief, and the horrible little truth that change asks something of us before it gives anything back.
As for your “someone” who complains of loneliness and then says no to invitations, doesn’t answer messages, wants to be understood but won’t explain themselves — yes, they may well be part of their own problem.
Most of us are.
That doesn’t mean the loneliness isn’t real.
Sometimes people refuse invitations because accepting one means admitting they wanted to be asked. Sometimes they don’t answer messages because the first reply feels like stepping onto a stage. Sometimes they say no one understands them because explaining themselves and still not being understood would hurt too much.
Is that frustrating for the people around them? Absolutely. Is it self-defeating? Often. Is it solved by telling them to “just join a club”? My dear, if human suffering could be cured by joining a club, the world would be a much quieter place and municipal badminton would have saved us all.
So here is my advice to your friend, whoever they may be wearing your shoes:
Stop using cynicism as a crash helmet.
It may protect you from looking foolish, but it also stops quite a lot of air getting in.
You don’t have to become one of those people who speaks entirely in therapy phrases and thanks the universe every time a parking space opens up. You don’t have to become soft-boiled and available to every invitation. But you do have to admit, at least privately, that wanting connection while avoiding exposure is a very lonely little trick.
Start small. Answer one message properly. Accept one low-stakes invitation. Tell one person the truth without making a joke immediately afterwards. Let yourself be seen in one inch of daylight and see if you burst into flames.
You probably won’t.
And if you still don’t believe in advice columns, that’s perfectly all right. I don’t believe in most things before breakfast either.
But you wrote.
So something in you is less convinced than you’re pretending.
Still not entirely convinced, but hopeful,
Joely