Dear Joely: Does It Count as Cheating If We Haven’t Done Anything?
She hasn’t kissed him. She hasn’t slept with him. Every message could be defended in court. So why did she feel sick when her husband called him a “good mate”? Joely considers the curious legal loopholes of emotional infidelity.
When every message is innocent, but the relationship isn’t.
Dear Joely,
I’m married, reasonably happily, and have been for eleven years. About six months ago I started working closely with a man in another department. Nothing has happened. We haven’t kissed, touched inappropriately, exchanged naked photographs or accidentally found ourselves sharing a hotel room at a conference.
But I think about him all the time.
We message most days, ostensibly about work, although work now seems to require an extraordinary number of observations about what we’ve had for dinner, things our partners have said, songs we like and whether either of us slept well.
I know when he’s had a bad day before his wife does. He knows things about my marriage that I haven’t told my closest friends. If something funny happens, he’s the person I want to tell. I’ve started choosing clothes for work based on whether I might see him.
Here’s the ridiculous part. We’ve never actually acknowledged that there’s anything between us. If you read our messages individually, almost every one could be defended in court.
My husband has met him. He likes him.
Last week my husband saw his name come up on my phone and said, completely innocently, “You two have become good mates.”
I felt sick.
So what exactly am I doing? Can you cheat on someone without ever doing anything that technically counts as cheating?
And if the answer is yes, what the hell do I do about it?
Yours, apparently not dead,
Married
Dear Married, But Apparently Not Dead,
The good news is that your vagina has an excellent alibi.
At all relevant times, it was elsewhere.
Unfortunately, I’m less convinced about the rest of you.
You’ve presented a meticulous case for the defence. No kissing. No inappropriate touching. No naked photographs. No hotel-room incident requiring you to explain why there was only one bathrobe.
You would particularly like entered into evidence the fact that every individual message is innocent.
I’m afraid the court is more interested in the pattern.
Because yes, something can become an affair before anybody takes their pants off.
We like physical cheating because it has lovely clear borders.
Kissed.
Touched.
Fucked.
You can point at an event and say, “There. Thursday. 9.17 pm. Infidelity commenced.”
Emotional intimacy is much less considerate.
There may be no Thursday. There may just be six months of Tuesdays.
A message after work. A private joke. A song. A bad day you tell him about before you tell your husband.
Nothing happens.
And then nothing happens again tomorrow.
Until an entirely defensible collection of nothings has become something.
And I think you already know that, because your husband saw this man’s name on your phone and said:
“You two have become good mates.”
And you felt sick.
That’s the bit I’d pay attention to.
Not because your husband caught you.
Because he didn’t.
He trusts the description he’s been given.
Good mates.
And you know it doesn’t quite describe what’s happening inside you.
People get crushes while married. They notice other people. Marriage does not cause every other sexually interesting human being on Earth to become a pot plant.
So forget, for a moment, whether a magistrate would officially declare you unfaithful.
Ask yourself instead:
What are you protecting from your husband?
The frequency of the messages? The intimacy? The anticipation? The fact that seeing this man’s name on your phone does something to you?
Because secrecy doesn’t always mean deleting messages and changing passwords.
Sometimes secrecy is simply allowing somebody to possess all the facts while withholding the meaning.
Then comes the more interesting question.
What do you actually want?
Do you want this man?
Do you want your husband?
Or do you want the version of yourself that appears when this other man is looking at you?
Funny again. Interesting again. Desired again.
Sometimes the intoxicating thing isn’t the new person.
It’s who we get to be with them.
So I’d put a little distance between you and your colleague while you work that out. Not because Joely has arrived in sensible shoes carrying a laminated sheet entitled APPROPRIATE WORKPLACE BOUNDARIES.
Because you need to look at your marriage without comparing it with a man who currently exists in beautifully edited fragments.
Your colleague doesn’t leave wet towels on your floor. You don’t know how he behaves when the boiler breaks and somebody has gastro.
Your husband is living in the full-length feature. This other man has an excellent trailer.
That doesn’t mean the attraction isn’t real.
It means you don’t yet know what it’s real for.
So no, Married But Apparently Not Dead, I’m not sentencing you to seven years for aggravated messaging.
But I am confiscating the argument that nothing is happening because nothing has happened.
Something has.
Your husband called it friendship.
Your stomach objected to the verdict.
I’d listen to your stomach.
It appears to be the only member of this arrangement who has stopped pretending not to know what’s going on.
Yours, in defence of innocent vaginas everywhere,
Joely
Dear Joely: My Best Friend Shagged Someone Beside Me
Her best friend brought a man back to their shared holiday bedroom. She’s furious. Joely wonders whether the real offence happened in the bed, or somewhere rather less obvious.
When your best friend crosses a boundary you didn't know needed explaining
Dear Joely,
You seem good at holiday problems so I thought I'd write in. I happened to find you while scrolling by the pool. My best friend (let's call her Christine) and I are both 24 and have known one another since secondary school. We are very close. There's no one either of us knows better in the world. We are called "the fixture" by my family. She's on the next sun lounge as I type this, but things are a bit strained at the moment.
We recently came to Tenerife on a holiday break, for a week. We looked forward to the trip as we have all our holidays in the past. Our days are made up of sunning ourselves, reading, chatting and swimming. In the afternoons we go back to the apartment and take our time getting ready for the evenings, a few drinks, getting showered and dressed and then out for dinner, more drinks, dancing and fun.
Last night was just like that. We both drank probably too much. Well, it was too much. At some point, I knew I needed to go back to the apartment. Christine wanted to stay out. I didn't think that was a problem. She was having fun with a guy. We weren't far away from the apartment. So I told her goodnight and told her to have a good night.
The sun shines in the curtains in the mornings and this morning was no exception. I felt as rough as a badger's arse. I looked over at Christine's bed. It was then that I realised she wasn't alone. I think it was the guy she was last dancing with when I left. To be honest, who cares? They weren't just sleeping, they were actually shagging. You know, in that kind of "let's do it quietly so we don't wake her up" sort of way.
I felt the bile rising in my throat, and I ran to the toilet and was sick. My head was banging and I was suddenly so angry I could barely see. I went back to my bed and just yelled at him to get the f*&% out. Christine started to protest. I just kept yelling, "Get out."
Things have been strained between us, to say the least, since this morning. I've got my dark glasses on and I'm under an umbrella on my sun bed, as I said. But I'm furious with her. She's tried to talk to me, but I won't have it. I just can't believe she'd treat me like this. I hope you can answer me urgently.
Yours,
Barf & Bitter
Dear Barf & Bitter,
First things first: your friend should not have brought a man back to your shared bedroom and shagged him while you were asleep three feet away.
I don't care how quietly they did it. Sex is not made private by reducing the volume.
You were entitled to wake up furious. You were entitled to tell him to leave. And Christine owes you an apology for deciding, without consulting you, that your shared bedroom could become hers for the night while you remained inconveniently unconscious in the other bed.
So far, I'm entirely under your umbrella.
But now I'm going to pull my sun lounge slightly away from yours.
You say, "I just can't believe she'd treat me like this."
Like what, exactly?
Because there are two possible offences here, and I'm not convinced you know which one has made you so angry.
Imagine the same morning again. Same murderous hangover. Same Tenerife sun drilling through the curtains. You roll over and Christine's bed is empty.
An hour later, she wanders in wearing last night's dress and somebody else's grin. She tells you she went home with the man from the bar and had spectacular sex.
Are you furious?
If the answer is no, excellent. We know what happened. Christine violated a perfectly reasonable boundary about your shared room, behaved selfishly while drunk, and now needs to apologise. You need to stop refusing to speak to her long enough to let her do it. You've been friends since secondary school. Don't turn one inconsiderate shag into the Treaty of Tenerife.
But if you're reading this and thinking, Actually, Joely, I'd still have hated it...
Then I'd be interested in that.
You call yourselves "the fixture". Your family calls you "the fixture". You holiday together. You have your rituals: sun lounges, books, swimming, the leisurely transformation from daytime selves into evening selves. And you tell me there's no one in the world who knows either of you better.
That's a beautiful friendship.
It may also have become an arrangement whose terms you've stopped examining.
Sometimes the most intimate friendships acquire invisible rules. We don't announce them because we don't realise they're rules. You'll choose me. I'll choose you. Other people may come and go, but this is the relationship that remains. This particular territory belongs to us.
Then somebody wanders into the territory wearing nightclub trousers and suddenly we discover there was a border.
I'm not telling you you're jealous of Christine. I'm certainly not telling you you're secretly in love with her. Perhaps neither is remotely true.
I'm asking whether you felt displaced.
Because your reaction interests me. You weren't merely irritated. You were incandescent. And somewhere between the badger's arse, the vomiting and the strange man moving rhythmically in the next bed, several different kinds of nausea may have become acquainted.
Incidentally, I wouldn't place too much evidentiary weight on the vomiting. You had drunk far too much and woke with your head banging. Christine's sex life may be many things, but I'm not yet prepared to hold it legally responsible for your stomach.
What I would do is take off the dark glasses, turn towards the woman on the next sun lounge and let her speak.
She may say, "I'm so sorry. I was drunk, I wasn't thinking and I behaved appallingly."
She may say, "I genuinely didn't think you'd care."
She may even say something that makes you angrier.
But at the moment you don't know, because you've sentenced your oldest friend before hearing her defence.
And when she has finished, tell her why you were angry.
Not just "You shouldn't have done that."
Tell her what hurt.
If all that hurt was waking beside an unsolicited live sex show, that's quite enough.
But if something else hurt too, don't be frightened of looking at it. You don't have to give it a name immediately. You just have to be honest enough to notice it.
You asked me urgently, so here is your emergency holiday prescription:
Drink some water. Eat something salty. Stop looking at Christine over the top of your sunglasses as though you're Joan Collins discovering a second will. And talk to your friend.
You have several days of Tenerife left.
Don't give the best sun lounge to a grudge.
Yours, in better boundaries and separate bedrooms,
Joely
Dear Joely: Was I Just His Wank Bank?
Sometimes the hardest heartbreak isn't losing a great love. It's discovering that what you thought was friendship was simply someone else's nostalgia, with benefits.
The memories are warm. The messages are filthy. Then she suggests meeting in real life and discovers just how little of the relationship exists outside his trousers.
Dear Joely,
An unanswered message has hurt me a bit, and I thought you might be able to give me some perspective.
Yes, it’s a man involved.
This man is not a current lover, far from it. I am not trying to win him back, and I wasn’t expecting some grand romantic reunion at the airport.
Here it is in a nutshell.
I met him when I was about 24, living and working in Scotland. I’m in Australia now. We worked together. He was married with two young children. We fell very hard for each other, and I became the other woman.
It went on for a few years and was exactly as intoxicating and dreadful as those situations tend to be. Ecstatic highs, terrible pain, an astonishing amount of sex and not nearly enough sense. I remember being convinced that I could no sooner hold back the tide than stop loving him.
Eventually he left his marriage, but he did not leave it for me. He left me as well and began a relationship with another woman from the office. They lived together for five years. I was heartbroken for much longer than I care to admit.
But somehow we never disappeared completely from one another’s lives.
Over the next thirty-five years there were occasional calls and messages. He would bring up old moments between us, sometimes very sentimental ones, as though they still meant something to him. I listened. I gave my best advice when he went through difficult times.
We have slept together a few times since, on my rare trips back. Our connection had always been intensely sexual.
About ten years ago, I suggested meeting while on one such trip and he sent me a very harsh reply. It was so dismissive that something in me finally woke up. I stopped speaking to him for years.
Then, around five years ago, he contacted me and asked whether I was really never going to speak to him again. We began corresponding once more. Some of it was ordinary conversation, some of it reminiscing, and quite a lot of it sexual.
To be blunt, I began to wonder whether I had become little more than a sort of wank bank.
He has old and newer photographs of me. He sends sexual scenarios and dick pics. I have joined in and sent him nude photographs too, although the truth is that I wasn’t really getting much from it anymore.
I wasn’t pining for him. I wasn’t imagining a future.
I simply thought there was affection there. History. Some basic friendship after all this time.
I told him I am going to Scotland for a holiday in a few months and will be flying home from his area. I asked whether he might like to spend a couple of days together at the end of the trip. I made it easy for him. I said that if he was happily involved with someone, or it simply wasn’t appropriate, that was completely fine.
He answered the next day with a breathless little message about how lovely the trip sounded, complete with enough exclamation marks to frighten a flock of birds, but he did not acknowledge my suggestion that we meet.
Not yes. Not no. Not even, “I’ll think about it.”
He simply stepped around it and carried on.
I wasn’t expecting sex. I wasn’t expecting declarations. I wasn’t even necessarily expecting him to say yes.
I was expecting a reply. I thought he'd be pleased to see me after all this time.
I think what has upset me is that for years he has spoken about our shared past as though it mattered to him. He has recalled rooms, moments, sex, things we said and things we did. He has accepted my listening, my advice, my photographs and my availability. He has behaved as though there is some tenderness attached to that history.
Yet when I appeared in the present as an actual person, asking for nothing more than a courteous answer, he vanished.
It feels awful. Worse, it feels familiar.
Not because I am still in love with him. I’m not.
It feels awful because I thought that after thirty-five years we had become old friends. Or, at the very least, two people who had once meant enough to each other to warrant basic respect.
Am I making too much of an unanswered message?
Or have I finally understood that he is sentimental about the memories, but not especially concerned with the woman who lived them?
Yours,
Closing an Account
Dear Closing an Account,
You are not upset because he did not agree to see you. You are upset because he could not bring himself to answer you plainly.
That distinction matters.
For years, he has revisited the history between you. He has remembered the sex, the rooms, the private moments and the woman who once loved him beyond reason. He has accepted your photographs, your attention, your advice and your willingness to enter his fantasies. This has apparently required no shortage of enthusiasm on his part.
Yet the moment you asked him to meet you in real life, he became strangely short of words.
There is something shabby about a man who can summon the energy to maintain a wank bank but not the manners to acknowledge the account holder.
He may insist, if challenged, that the memories meant something to him. Perhaps they did. But sentiment is very easy when it asks nothing of us. It can survive for decades on reminiscence, fantasy and selective tenderness. Ask it to do something as ordinary as answer an invitation and suddenly the whole structure begins to wobble.
That is because nostalgia can imitate intimacy for a very long time.
You thought the two of you had become old friends. He appears to have thought he had retained access to an old lover.
Those are not the same arrangement.
The unanswered message was not the wound. It was the diagnosis.
Never mistake someone’s ability to remember you for their willingness to show up for you. They are entirely different talents.
He has shown a considerable gift for the first and very little appetite for the second.
Do not ask again. Do not send a wounded follow-up. Do not explain why his response hurt you. Do not provide him with another opportunity to turn your perfectly reasonable expectation into an emotional discussion he can avoid, minimise or eroticise.
And when he next returns with a sentimental memory in one hand and his trousers unfastened with the other, do not confuse the performance with affection.
The house of cards has already fallen. You are simply no longer obliged to crawl underneath it looking for friendship.
Yours, in closed accounts and considerably better investments,
Joely
Dear Joely: The Case of the Wandering Toe
Four neighbours, drinks beneath the stars and one supposedly civilised spa arrangement. Everything is lovely — until an adventurous toe begins crossing boundaries below the waterline.
Dear Joely,
I am fortunate to live in one of the nicer areas of Sydney with my husband and our two young children. All is as well as can be in those departments.
We are very good friends with our neighbours across the street. They are a couple, about ten years older than us. Every month or so, the four of us get together for drinks and some food. We alternate between our houses as the venue.
We both have spas in our yards and, at the end of these evenings, we usually end up having a tub together, with more drinks and chats. We don’t wear clothes on these occasions. This isn’t for any racy reason. It just came about because none of us normally wears clothes when in our own spa, so we figured: why would we start on these social evenings?
Nothing is made of the nudity, and we all really enjoy chatting together in the warm tub under the stars.
All good so far, but the problem is this: the male neighbour has taken to touching me underwater with his toe.
I don’t mean an accidental touch. I mean he is putting his toe between my legs and looking for encouragement.
This is incredibly awkward for me. If I call it out when it’s happening, that’s the evening — and possibly future get-togethers — finished. Or he could deny it.
If I speak to the female neighbour about it alone — we are very close as friends — she might feel awkward or jealous, or not believe me.
I told my husband, and he seems more amused than anything.
I don’t want to encourage him in any way. I like things, apart from this problem, as they are.
I learned of your page from a different friend and thought — hoped — you might be able to help.
Yours
Unwanted Toe Attention
Dear Unwanted Toe Attention,
What a beautifully civilised arrangement you have created: good friends, warm water, drinks beneath the stars — and one man’s big toe attempting to start a separate social programme.
Let us clear up the only part that appears to be confusing anyone. Being naked in a spa is not an invitation to be touched. Your neighbour knows the difference between an accidental brush of the foot and deliberately placing his toe between your legs while watching to see what happens next.
This is not a rogue limb. He is conducting a small underwater feasibility study:
Will she react?
Will she say anything?
Might the toe be permitted to return?
The answer to the final question must be no.
You do not need to turn the evening into a neighbourhood emergency or suddenly announce, “Whose toe is that, and why is it there?”
Although it would settle the question rather efficiently.
The next time it happens, move away, look directly at him and say quietly:
“Please don’t do that again.”
No nervous laugh. No apology. No long explanation that allows him to pretend you have misunderstood the fascinating migratory habits of his foot.
If he denies it, simply say:
“Good. Then it won’t happen again.”
That is all you need.
I would not begin by speaking privately to his wife. He created the problem, and it should not be handed to the two women to manage between them over coffee. Speaking to her first also gives him the opportunity to deny it before you have ever addressed him directly.
Your husband’s amusement deserves a second conversation too. Tell him plainly that you are not flattered, entertained or secretly enjoying the attention. You feel uncomfortable and sexually intruded upon, and you need him to take that seriously. He does not have to storm across the street with a pool noodle unless that is what you want, but he does need to stop treating it as a saucy neighbourhood anecdote.
You are worried that objecting may spoil the evening or end future gatherings.
But darling, the evenings are already being spoiled. You are sitting in warm, bubbling water wondering whether a toe is about to make another covert border crossing while everyone discusses schools, renovations and interest rates above the surface.
That is no way to relax.
One calm, unmistakable boundary may be enough to return the foot to ordinary civilian life. Should it happen again, I would retire the shared spa evenings altogether. Not because nudity caused the problem, but because one guest has shown that he cannot be trusted with the arrangement.
Warm water, cold drinks and neighbourly nudity can coexist perfectly well.
They simply require all four adults — and all forty toes — to behave themselves.
Yours, with both feet firmly where they belong,
Joely
More dilemmas? Read more letters and replies in the Dear Joely advice column.
Dear Joely: My Friends Stopped Inviting Me Out Since I Got Engaged
She’s 26, newly engaged, and just finished her nursing degree — but now her old friendship group has stopped inviting her out. Joely answers a letter about growing up, changing friendships, and how to say, “I’m still here.”
Dear Joely,
I stumbled on your page. I hope you can help.
I’m 26. Rather than tell you loads of boring story about how I got where I am, I’ll try and make it as easy as I can.
I’ve just finished my degree in nursing. Apart from all the study and exams, I had a wonderful time. I had lots of friends around me and a fantastic social life.
I met a fantastic guy on one of our great nights out. He and I just got closer and closer, and we’re now engaged and living together. I’m happy with that, but it feels like my friends have left me behind.
I don’t usually get texted now when they’re going out as a group. I find out about it afterwards, and it really hurts. They just say, “Oh, you’re always busy.”
We used to do everything together. There was a really close group. Now it’s like we can talk, but it’s really basic chat. Nobody bothers going into what’s really going on with them — well, with me anyway.
I miss talking properly to my friends, and while I’m happy with my fiancé, I feel really excluded even though I’ve done nothing wrong. It’s starting to affect my relationship with my fiancé a bit because I’m down in the dumps a lot of the time.
Sorry, this is a bit mixed up.
Sad and Left Behind
Dear Sad and Left Behind,
First of all, congratulations on finishing your nursing degree. That is not a small thing. That is a very large thing involving caffeine, panic, shoes that hurt, and possibly a relationship with laminated notes that became too intimate.
And congratulations on the fiancé too. A good one, I hope. One who knows how to make tea, apologise properly, and not say “calm down” unless he has a death wish.
Now to the sore bit.
I don’t think you’ve done anything wrong. But I do think something has changed, and everyone is pretending it hasn’t.
Groups are funny creatures. At university, friendship can feel effortless because everyone is in the same stream. Same deadlines, same nights out, same shared exhaustion, same cheap wine, same tiny dramas given Shakespearean importance at 2 a.m.
Then someone graduates. Someone gets engaged. Someone starts shift work. Someone moves in with a partner. Suddenly the stream divides, and people often handle that very badly. Instead of saying, “We miss you, but we don’t know how to fit you in now,” they say, “Oh, you’re always busy.”
That line hurts because it makes their exclusion sound like your fault.
But here is the awkward little truth: they may not be deliberately leaving you out. They may have made a lazy assumption that engaged-you is no longer available in the same way single-student-you was. They may think they’re being considerate. Or they may be avoiding the slightly uncomfortable feeling that the group is changing and nobody knows what to do with that.
The first thing I’d do is stop waiting for the group to magically remember you. Pick one friend — the kindest one, not necessarily the loudest one — and say something plain.
Not dramatic. Not accusatory. Just honest.
Try:
“I know life has changed a bit since I moved in with him, but I really miss you all. I’ve noticed I’m not being included as much, and it’s hurt more than I wanted to admit. I still want to be part of things.”
Then be specific. Suggest a night. Suggest coffee. Suggest drinks after work. Don’t just say, “We should catch up,” because that phrase has sent more friendships to the grave than almost anything else.
Also, make sure you are not accidentally waiting to be invited while giving off the signal that your fiancé is now your whole social life. That happens more easily than people think. Love is wonderful, but it can become a very comfortable little cave, and sometimes our friends stop knocking because they think we’ve moved in permanently with the candles and the throw rugs.
This does not mean your fiancé has done anything wrong. But it is worth being careful not to make him responsible for filling every emotional gap your friends have left. That’s too much pressure on a relationship, especially a young engaged one. He can love you beautifully and still not be a group of girlfriends.
So build both things: your relationship and your friendships. They need different rooms in your life.
And if you do reach out clearly, and they still keep excluding you? Then you will have your answer. Painful, yes, but useful. Some friendships are for a season, and some survive the awkward transition into adult life. The ones worth keeping will make space for the fuller version of you — nurse, fiancée, friend, tired human, all of it.
You haven’t been left behind because you moved forward.
But you may need to turn around, wave your arms a little, and say, “I’m still here, you idiots.”
With sympathy, and a firm vote for one proper girls’ night very soon,
Joely
Dear Joely: I Said the Cruel Thing Out Loud at Dinner
A reader wakes at 4:17am after telling a heartbroken friend what she really thinks. Joely weighs in on drunken honesty, clean apologies and the limits of loyalty.
Dear Joely,
I think I may have ruined a friendship over dinner.
A group of us were at a friend’s house on Saturday night — eight or nine people around the table, wine, food, everyone talking over each other in that way that feels fun at the time and unbearable when you remember it later.
One of my closest friends started talking about her ex again. They split up nearly a year ago, but he still comes up constantly. I have listened to hours of it. I really have tried to be kind. I know people don’t just stop hurting because their friends are bored of the subject.
But I’d had too much to drink, and when she started going over the same old ground, I said something like, “I don’t think you miss him anymore. I think you miss having him to talk about.”
The table went quiet.
She looked absolutely wounded. I tried to laugh it off, then tried to explain, which probably made it worse. The rest of the night carried on, but not really. You know when everyone is pretending things are normal and they absolutely aren’t?
I went home feeling embarrassed, but it wasn’t until 4:17 in the morning that the full horror hit me. I woke up wide awake thinking, What did I say? Why did I say it in front of everyone?
The awful thing is, I don’t know if I was completely wrong. Part of me does think she’s become attached to the drama of it. But I also know I was cruel. I could have said something privately, soberly, gently — or just kept my mouth shut.
She hasn’t replied to my message today.
Do I apologise properly, or will that just make it all bigger? And am I a terrible friend for being so tired of hearing about someone else’s heartbreak?
Still Cringing at 4:17am
Dear Still Cringing,
First of all, congratulations on discovering one of adulthood’s least glamorous truths: sometimes the thing that should have stayed inside your head comes out wearing a dinner-party voice.
Was it cruel? Yes, a bit.
Was it unforgivable? No.
Was it possibly true? Also yes, which is why it landed with such a thud.
That’s the trouble with drunken honesty. It often contains just enough truth to be dangerous, and nowhere near enough kindness to be useful. You didn’t say, “I’m worried you’re still hurting and I don’t know how to help.” You said, in effect, “I’m tired of your pain and I think you may be enjoying it.” At a table. In front of witnesses. With wine assisting the prosecution.
So yes, you owe her an apology.
Not a long, self-flagellating performance. Not a twenty-seven-message essay about your motives, your exhaustion, your guilt and the exact time your soul sat bolt upright in bed. She doesn’t need to manage your remorse as well as her humiliation.
Send something simple:
I’m really sorry for what I said at dinner. It was hurtful, and saying it in front of everyone made it worse. I had no right to embarrass you like that. I care about you, and I’m sorry.
That’s it. No “but.” No “I was just trying to say.” No “you have to admit.” No courtroom reconstruction.
The apology is for the way you said it, where you said it, and what it did to her.
Later — much later, if the friendship recovers and she invites real conversation — there may be room for the truth underneath it: that you love her, but you cannot be the permanent storage facility for one man’s emotional debris. Friends are allowed to have limits. Even kind friends. Even loyal friends. Even friends who have sat through every chapter of the breakup, including the director’s commentary.
But timing matters.
If someone is bleeding, you don’t start by saying, “To be fair, this carpet has suffered enough.”
For now, apologise cleanly. Give her space. Let her decide whether she wants to answer.
And no, you are not a terrible friend for being tired. You are a tired friend who said the tired part out loud, badly, after wine, under domestic lighting.
That is not a life sentence. It is a repair job.
Next time, if the same conversation starts circling the drain, try the sober version:
I love you, and I want to support you, but I think we might be stuck in the same loop. Can we talk about what would actually help you now?
Less dramatic than a dinner-table truth bomb, admittedly. But much kinder to the crockery.
With sympathy, and a glass of water before bed,
Joely
More dilemmas? Read more letters and replies in the Dear Joely advice column.
Dear Joely: I Kissed My Best Friend’s Boyfriend. What Now?
She kissed her best friend’s boyfriend at an eighteenth birthday party. Now she’s ashamed, confused, and desperate to repair the friendship. Joely gives her the honest answer.
Dear Joely,
I hope you can answer me quickly. I’ve stuffed up. Badly.
I’m in my late teens. I’m lucky enough to have a best friend that I can share everything with. And she shares everything with me too. We both live with our parents still.
She has a new boyfriend — let’s call him Ross. She’s fancied him for a long time, and they finally got together.
She had a party at her parents’ place for her 18th. I was there, of course, and so was Ross. It was a fun party. Lots of booze, chips and party food — like a kid’s party but more fun because we’re all older and can legally do all the stuff we’ve always wondered about.
I was walking up the side of the house when I saw Ross. He saw me too. We looked at each other and before I knew what was happening we were having a passionate pash under a nearby tree.
Then of course my friend wandered out and saw us.
Personally, I don’t know why I did it. There were certainly no plans to do anything with Ross — I always just thought of him as her guy. This was a real spur-of-the-moment fuck-up.
My friend was so cool about it. I apologised, but her eyes are saying, “I love you but why would you do this to me?”
I have no answers and feel nothing but deep shame. I don’t want to carry on seeing Ross or anything.
What should I do?
A Really Crappy Friend
Dear Really Crappy Friend,
First things first: yes, you stuffed up.
There’s no elegant way to put lipstick on that particular pig. You kissed your friend’s boyfriend at her own eighteenth birthday party, which is very much not the behaviour of the bridesmaid in a feel-good film.
But — and this is important — one dreadful, stupid, impulsive thing does not have to become the permanent title of your character.
You already know the kiss was wrong. That’s good. Shame, unpleasant though it is, can occasionally do useful work. It tells us where the line was, and that we crossed it. The trick is not to pitch a tent in the shame and start calling it home.
What you do now is simple, but not easy.
You apologise properly. Not dramatically. Not with self-pity. Not with a long speech about how terrible you feel, because then she ends up having to comfort you, which is just adding unpaid emotional admin to her birthday betrayal.
Say something like:
“I am so sorry. What I did was wrong and it hurt you. I don’t have an excuse, and I’m not going to insult you by pretending I do. I care about you, and I understand if you need space from me.”
Then stop talking.
Let her be angry. Let her be quiet. Let her ask questions. Let her not ask questions. Do not chase forgiveness like it’s a bus you’re late for.
As for Ross, avoid him. Completely. No private messages. No “clearing the air.” No sad little conversations under trees about how confused everyone is. The tree has already done enough.
If he contacts you, keep it short:
“What happened was wrong. I’m not continuing this. You need to speak honestly with her.”
And then back away.
Your friend’s eyes are asking, “Why would you do this to me?” The truthful answer may simply be: because you were drunk, flattered, impulsive, curious, reckless, and briefly more interested in being wanted than being loyal.
That is not pretty, but it is human.
The repair, if there is one, will come from consistency. Not one perfect apology. Not tears. Not grand gestures. Consistency.
Be honest. Give her space. Don’t touch Ross. Don’t recruit mutual friends to plead your case. Don’t make yourself the victim of your own guilt.
You may lose some closeness for a while. You may lose the friendship. That is the price of the moment, and you have to respect it.
But you can also learn from it.
Next time desire, alcohol and opportunity gather under a tree, remember: trees are for shade, not betrayal.
With sympathy, but not a party invitation,
Joely
More dilemmas? Read more letters and replies in the Dear Joely advice column.
Dear Joely: Exit Group?
A reader finds herself trapped in a school WhatsApp group full of chatter, politics, and “helpful” women with too much data and too little restraint. Joely answers on digital overexposure, low-grade social captivity, and the beauty of mute.
Dear Joely,
I’ve been added to a school WhatsApp group and I already hate it.
I know it’s meant to be useful, and sometimes it is, but most of the time it’s just endless messages about things that don’t seem to require that many messages. Every day there’s somebody asking something that has already been answered, or reminding everyone about something, or sending a stream of updates about snacks, costumes, pick-up times, forms, or who’s bringing what.
What gets me is that I can’t tell whether I’m being unreasonable or whether everyone else is just pretending this is normal. Some of the women in it seem to live there. They’re constantly replying, offering to do things, thanking each other, sending little kisses at the end of every message, and somehow making quite ordinary school admin feel like a full-time emotional ecosystem. I find it exhausting.
There’s also a certain tone in there that gets under my skin. It’s all very friendly on the surface, but I can never quite shake the feeling that there’s competition and judgement bubbling away underneath. I don’t want to be rude, and I don’t want to look unfriendly, but I also don’t want to spend my life reading forty-three messages about a missing drink bottle.
Is it acceptable to mute it, ignore most of it, or even leave altogether, or is that social suicide?
Signed,
One Ping from Murder
Dear One Ping,
The first thing I want you to know is that you are not oversensitive. You are having an entirely normal reaction to being trapped in a digital village square with no closing time.
WhatsApp groups of this sort are a very modern species of suffering. They begin in usefulness and end in low-grade occupation. A quick note about sports day becomes a hundred and forty-seven messages, three theories, one volunteer spreadsheet, and an undercurrent of feminine territorial warfare thinly disguised as helpfulness.
You are not obliged to enjoy this simply because it involves children and snack-sized administrative duties. Nor are you required to mistake access for intimacy. These groups create the illusion that because people can reach you instantly, they are therefore entitled to do so constantly. They are not.
Now, as to what to do. I would not dramatically leave unless you are genuinely prepared to be talked about by women in activewear for a fortnight. The elegant answer is almost always the less theatrical one. Mute the group. Archive it if necessary. Turn off previews. Remove it from the front of your mind and let the urgent things surface by other means, as truly urgent things usually do.
And if someone asks why you are a little quiet, you may say, perfectly pleasantly, that you are trying to spend less time on your phone. This has the additional advantage of sounding virtuous while being entirely self-protective.
What you must not do is get drawn into the false morality of constant responsiveness. There is a particular kind of social nonsense that thrives on women feeling they must always appear agreeable, available, and faintly delighted to help. It is a racket. Step outside it where you can.
You do not need to surrender your peace over a visor, a raffle roster, or twelve messages about whether Friday is mufti. Keep your manners, keep your distance, and keep the group on mute.
Yours, on mute,
Joely